Start Define relative dating of fossils

Define relative dating of fossils

So, some caution might be in order before even long established theories are accepted as the "gospel truth", especially when some of the most famous scientists in the field start to question their own life's work.

But if, as the peculiarities of the tooth suggest, I dare say that this disclaimer comment did not disclaim enough!

It is fine to hypothesize that similarities between different creatures are the result of common ancestry, but since such similarities have been and are often conflicting when compared with other features, it might be prudent to hold back a little when making conclusions about any sort of definite taxonomic classification model or even relationship.

The conclusions that are drawn from the evidence are often and have often been very much exaggerated to fit personal beliefs and biases.

But why shouldn't the Piltdown Man hoax be discussed?

The success of the Piltdown Man hoax gives us an interesting look into human nature.

It was not until 38 years after the bones had been "found" that the hoax was exposed.

In 1953 Kenneth Of course many scientists love to predict the discussion of Piltdown Man by those who are doubtful of evolution.

Other arguments contend that the differences from other fossil hominids are said to have turned Piltdown Man into a puzzling anomaly well before the hoax was discovered and, that by the time the hoax was revealed, most scientists were rather relieved to be finally rid of Piltdown Man.